Timeline for C116 vs C64 cost
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2020 at 8:29 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| S Jan 25, 2019 at 12:04 | history | suggested | CommunityBot | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Edited for spelling, grammar and readability
|
| Jan 25, 2019 at 9:27 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jan 25, 2019 at 12:04 | |||||
| Jan 24, 2019 at 22:52 | comment | added | Raffzahn | @Janka THX, corrected. | |
| Jan 24, 2019 at 22:51 | history | edited | Raffzahn | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 722 characters in body
|
| Jan 24, 2019 at 16:17 | comment | added | Janka | @Raffzahn: That's the prototype board of the C16. You should post the mass manufactured board, which was double-sided for the C16, too. | |
| Jan 24, 2019 at 12:38 | comment | added | Raffzahn | @tofro yes, I would also tend more toward less than 2 USD - then again, I tried to be careful, as the over all saving is already quite impressive, isn't it? | |
| Jan 24, 2019 at 12:34 | comment | added | tofro | I think your chicklet vs. "real" keyboard cost comparison at half the price is still way too high. Think not only material, but also assembly cost. I'd rather assume something along the line of 10%. | |
| S Jan 24, 2019 at 10:39 | history | edited | Raffzahn | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
pictures added.
|
| Jan 24, 2019 at 10:34 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jan 24, 2019 at 10:39 | |||||
| Jan 24, 2019 at 6:44 | vote | accept | rwallace | ||
| Jan 24, 2019 at 0:32 | history | answered | Raffzahn | CC BY-SA 4.0 |