Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 5, 2019 at 22:25 comment added Stephen Kitt @R. as long as you don’t mind a hefty speed penalty ;-).
Apr 5, 2019 at 22:23 comment added R.. GitHub STOP HELPING ICE Address lines aren't really a limit if you use EMS or paging in protected mode. You could put an unlimited amount of ram on the ISA bus if you were happy with having a driver to interface with it.
Apr 5, 2019 at 18:41 comment added mnem 8MB being "considered large" in '92 is a bit of an understatement. 4MB (4 1MB SIMMs) was standard 2 years later for a 486 PC. Typical 386 PCs had 1 to 2MB, 4 or 8 256KB SIMMs.
Apr 5, 2019 at 18:28 comment added Gnudiff Well, it was obviously Intel 80x86 architecture you were talking about, so just as a side note I remember a tech guy at my uni showing me his fully packed Sparcstation 10 in 1994, which had 512mb, so half of the GB.
Apr 5, 2019 at 13:53 comment added Stephen Kitt Ah, right, yes — adding lines costs money and would only be done if it was useful!
Apr 5, 2019 at 13:48 comment added Bernhard Döbler Sorry, I dont want to create confusion. The processors sure had the addresses. I always believed motherboards were not equipped to handle that much memory as it was not needed.
Apr 5, 2019 at 13:34 comment added Bernhard Döbler The limit by address lines is the important factor one could not put 4 GiB memory into a 386 setup. There were practical reasons that beat theory.
Apr 5, 2019 at 13:19 history edited Stephen Kitt CC BY-SA 4.0
Missing word, more accurate personal history.
Apr 5, 2019 at 13:03 history edited Stephen Kitt CC BY-SA 4.0
There were expansion boards too.
Apr 5, 2019 at 12:39 history edited Stephen Kitt CC BY-SA 4.0
RAM prices. Date the advert.
Apr 5, 2019 at 12:29 vote accept d33tah
Apr 5, 2019 at 12:25 history edited Stephen Kitt CC BY-SA 4.0
Alpha context.
Apr 5, 2019 at 12:16 history answered Stephen Kitt CC BY-SA 4.0