Mismatched disk/drive refers to, for example, reading/writing a 720K disk with a 1.44M drive.

Don't forget LS-120 and LS-240 SuperDisk drives, they can use standard floppies too.

What can and can't be read/written with a given drive type?

  • Is the diskette drive working properly? I have a 3.25 inch drive (old) that will read 1.44MB or 720KB floppies OK.
    – John
    Apr 7, 2020 at 1:11
  • 1
    @john My drives do work. The purpose of this question is for when they don't work, as I'd be able to know if a given combination of drive type, disk type and formatting is supposed to work i.e. this isn't asking to fix a problem, just asking to generate reference material for troubleshooting in the future.
    – Alexander M
    Apr 7, 2020 at 1:52
  • Plesae edit the question to include any clarification. As of now it's hard to give any useful answer due the missing intend/environment. Also, it's way too broad for a sensible answerr, as it would include anything from 8" to 2.5" with various writing schemes and dozends of different head technologies. In general, there is no such ting as a mismatch that works. A drive's hardware is either made on purpose to be able to fit certain specifications or not. Likewise it's controller to produce/consume a certain bitstream, as well as drivers and OS to handle both and the data structures as well.
    – Raffzahn
    Apr 7, 2020 at 10:39
  • @Raffzahn The question is not too vague; if you understand the essential characteristics of the common floppy drives you can answer all the questions that arise from this.
    – cjs
    Apr 7, 2020 at 14:09

2 Answers 2


I’ll limit my answer to common 3.5” formats on PCs, DSDD, DSHD, and SuperDisk, as listed in your question.

SuperDisk drives can be ignored as far as backwards-compatibility is concerned: they have two head assemblies, one for “standard” formats, the other for LS formats, and the “standard” head is equivalent to a high-density 3.5” drive’s.

The main concern with non-LS 3.5” floppies is the metal used in the medium. DSDD and DSHD floppies use different metals, with different coercivities. HD drives can adjust their field strength to write appropriately, so an HD drive can write to a DD floppy without creating issues. Problems arise when using a DSHD floppy in a DD drive: it is possible to format a DSHD floppy using a DD format, but if the floppy was ever formatted with an HD format (or was pre-formatted, as was common in the late 90s), a DD drive won’t be able to correctly reformat it (because its write signal isn’t strong enough). Problems can also arise when overwriting data on a DD-formatted floppy using an HD drive; it’s always better to “write from blank”.

The basic rules of thumb for 3.5” drives are:

  • ideally, use appropriate media — in particular, use DSDD floppies in DD-only systems;
  • always format floppies in the system they’re intended for — thus, if you want to transfer data to a DD-only system, format the floppy in that system, and write to it using whatever system you’re transferring from;
  • always clear data in the lowest-density system; the simplest approach here is to reformat disks before any re-use (deleting or overwriting files);
  • stick to “standard” formats if you want to exchange data — 720K for DSDD, 1.44M for DSHD.

Exchanging data with non-PC systems can be more complex (especially with Macs and Amigas), and in such scenarios it’s often better to stick to PC formats for data transfer.

Using non-standard formats in PCs (as produced e.g. by FDFORMAT or 2M) can introduce compatibility problems too, and they should generally be avoided for transfer between systems (unless you also transfer the drive that formatted the disks).

  • I have personal experience of using DSDD disks to transfer many files from a HD system to a DD system. Deleting / overwriting files in the HD system led to read errors on the DD end. A good workaround was to format the disk in the DD system after each transfer, before writing fresh data onto the blank disk in the HD system.
    – Kaz
    Apr 7, 2020 at 12:42
  • @Kaz with 3.5” floppies? I’ve had problems doing that with 5.25” floppies, but not so much with 3.5” floppies (which of course only means I haven’t run into troublesome situations). Apr 7, 2020 at 12:51
  • Yes, 3.5" floppies, transferring files from a PC to an Acorn Archimedes (DOS 720k format).
    – Kaz
    Apr 7, 2020 at 13:03

Below I don't discuss the issue of single-sided versus double-sided drives since it seems sufficiently obvious. Also, when I say "PC" I'm refering to common western IBM PC-compatible computers.

Amongst commonly used floppy drives, there are only three basic types you need to worry about. 3.5" drives are essentially smaller versions of 5.25" drives, so the issues are the same for both types.

  • Double-density (DD) 40-track drives¹². These are the drives used on the original IBM PC. The diskettes are generally formatted to hold 320 or 360 KB double-sided (160 or 180 KB single-sided).
  • Double-density (DD) 80-track drives. These were almost unknown in 5.25" form in western PCs, but not uncommon in some other countries (such as Japan) and on non-PC computers. The diskettes are generally formatted to hold 640 or 720 KB, double-sided.
  • High-density (HD) 80-track drives. The diskettes are generally formatted to hold 1.2 MB (5.25") or 1.44 MB (3.5").

As Stephen points out, there are only two types of media: "double-density" (which is actually the same as single-density media) and high-density. These have different magnetic properties and, while DD drives may be able to write on HD floppies and vice versa, this will be extremely unreliable at best.

HD drives almost invariably support writing to DD formats as well. This is automatic in the case of 3.5" HD drives (via the second hole in the corner across from the write-protect hole); for 5.25" HD drives you must manually specify DD format (though the OS may check and do this for you, except when formatting diskettes). However, HD drives are also invariably 80-track drives, and will have the same issues with 40-track interchange as 80-track DD drives.

The issue between 40- and 80-track drives is that the 80-track drives use a narrower head and read/write a narrower track. Thus an 80-track drive will read a 40-track diskette produced by either type of drive with no problem. However, a 40-track drive will generally have great difficulty reading any sectors (or full tracks) written in 40-track format by an 80-track drive. (Many retries may eventually produce a successful read.)

As Stephen also points out, the LS drives are are a completely separate thing with their own heads, and so not really relevant for interchange.

¹The oldest models of these drives used only 35 tracks, but are otherwise compatible so long as you don't try to access the additional five tracks used later. Even into the '80s some drive systems, such as the Apple II and Commodore 1541, used only the first 35 tracks though the drives themselves were capable of accessing all 40 tracks.

²Yes, there are 3.5" DD 40-track drives. They were quite rare in the (western) PC world, but not uncommon elsewhere, such as in Japan. I own several, and have data sheets.

  • I take your second footnote is referring to 5.25” drives, is that correct? Apr 7, 2020 at 14:25
  • @StephenKitt I was editing this while you were writing your comment and the footnotes have changed, but I think you were referring to "DD 80-track drives were rare in western PCs." Yes, it was 5.25" ones that were almost unknown in western PCs; as I recall 3.5" ones were widely available for a little while until HD took over. I've tweaked the post to make that clear.
    – cjs
    Apr 7, 2020 at 14:42
  • Right, thanks. 80-track DD 3.5” drives were definitely a thing on PCs at one point (especially on Amstrad/Sinclair PCs), and on the Atari ST of course (which also started with single-sided drives). I wanted to avoid discussing the whole 40- v. 80-track aspect, which is why I stuck to 3.5” drives, since on PCs in the West it was only really a problem on 5.25” drives... Apr 7, 2020 at 14:57
  • 1
    @StephenKitt Yes, that's the standard approach for PCs, but I think a lot of the confusion about HD vs. DD compatibility is actually confusion with the 40- vs. 80-track issue. (I know I was confused that way for decades, until I started dealing with Japanese microcomputers and their wider variety of drive types.)
    – cjs
    Apr 7, 2020 at 15:05

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .