Do I remember correctly about an unofficial but popular test of "PC compatibility" in the early 1980s? Basically if a machine could run vanilla versions of both Lotus 1-2-3 and Microsoft Flight Simulator, reviewers at the time would declare it as "PC Compatible". (Note that back then, customized versions of popular software were often available on well-regarded machines.) One particular memory is that the DEC Rainbow 100 computer, while superior to clones in almost every aspect, failed this particular benchmark and was deemed by the computer press as inadequate.

1 Answer 1


Yes, I think you did. E.g. from The Digital Antiquarian:

Having quickly concluded that simply copying IBM’s ROMs wasn’t a wise option, Compaq hired a staff of fifteen programmers who would dedicate the months to come to creating a slavish imitation. ... Instead of relying on IBM’s published BIOS specifications ... the team took the thirty biggest applications on the market and worked through them one at a time, analyzing each BIOS call each program made and figuring out through trial and error what response it needed to receive. The two trickiest programs, which would go on to become a sort of stress test for clone compatibility both inside and outside of Compaq, proved to be Lotus 1-2-3 and Microsoft Flight Simulator.

  • 3
    Other instances include the marketing materials for the Olivetti M-24 (AT&T 6300 in the US) which specifically mentioned its compatibility with Lotus 1-2-3 and Microsoft Flight Simulator (see also its review in Creative Computing). It was common at the time for reviewers to test new PCs with the programs they used; see this BYTE review of the PC1512 and Xen-i. Jun 26, 2020 at 15:02
  • I was quite fond of my DEC Rainbow. But it was a long time before you could run LOTUS 1-2-3 on it. Some pretty good free software for it, if you knew where to look. Jun 27, 2020 at 9:54

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .