Consider a pair of early 14" CRT monitors, one green screen 80x25 text, one color 640x480 graphics. It seems reasonable to conjecture that both could have the same resolution; at least if you suppose characters are eight pixels horizontally, 80x8 = 640.

It would be somewhat useful for them to be interchangeable. Using a color monitor as a green screen text display leaves some of its capability unused, using a green screen in place of a color monitor forgoes color, but there are contexts in which this would still be a lot better than nothing (e.g. the correct monitor is on the blink or whatever).

Can they be interchanged? I'm guessing the answer is contingently no, just because they were designed by different companies that randomly came up with different connectors.

My real question is, could they be interchanged if some effort was made to make them so? Or is there some reason this would be costly or impractical? Is there something about a green screen text display that wants a special connector to get lower cost or better resolution, that makes it undesirable to use the same connector as a 640x480 color monitor?

  • 1
    You missed the primary difference between the two monitors here, which is that the monochrome monitor (generally) has significantly higher horizontal resolution (measured as TVL) than the colour monitor. The shadow mask or aperture grille dividing the differently-coloured phosphors into dots or lines has its own resolution which limits (in a complex way) the effective horizontal resolution of the video card and monitor combination. Thus text at the same resolution will usually be significantly clearer on a monochrome monitor.
    – cjs
    Jul 27, 2022 at 7:12

3 Answers 3


The very short answer is no, because no “green screen” standard is compatible with VGA (which is where 640×480 was introduced). The slightly longer answer is yes, but only in a very small number of situations.

The important aspect here is the signal sent from whatever system is driving the display, to the display. Early display adapters (apart from those intended for use with TVs) tended to use digital signals: MDA, CGA, Hercules, EGA and others. VGA and onwards (including non-VGA workstation displays) switched to analog signals, until the advent of DVI-D. Digital here means TTL: on/off only. Early digital monitors tended to be fixed frequency, or at best support a fixed set of discrete frequencies (EGA and VGA monitors).

MDA and Hercules were designed for a resolution of 720×350, with frequencies of 18,432 Hz (horizontal) and 50 Hz (vertical), and used six pins in a nine-pin connector: two ground pins, horizontal and vertical sync, intensity and video (which were combined to provide up to four display intensities, although not all monitors supported the video signal). MDA was text-only, but that doesn’t matter as far as the monitor is concerned.

CGA introduced colour with resolutions up to 640×200, frequencies of 15.75 kHz (horizontal) and 60 Hz (vertical — it was designed to also drive NTSC displays); it used the three available pins from MDA to send red, green and blue signals (remember, just on/off) and dropped the video signal.

EGA moved up to 640×350, with two frequencies: 15.75 kHz horizontal (for backwards compatibility with CGA) or 21.8 kHz horizontal, and 60 Hz vertical. It used the same RGB pins as CGA, and repurposed one ground and the intensity and video signals for RGB intensity (for 64 colours altogether). The new pins are only used for EGA-specific modes.

All the above used the same connector, and the signals are similar enough that you could build adapters. In fact, many EGA cards had jumpers that could be used to configure them to produce an MDA-compatible signal; CGA modes on EGA cards are compatible with CGA monitors. Thus you can use an EGA system with nearly any digital monitor (although the monitor used would limit the available modes, and connecting an EGA system to a CGA monitor which actually connected the repurposed ground pin could destroy the graphics adapter). Some (most?) EGA monitors such as the IBM 5154 were backwards-compatible with CGA. But the 50 Hz frequency of the MDA/Hercules signals would probably mean that colour displays (expecting 60 Hz) wouldn’t work with them.

Going back to your question, all this means that you could use an EGA system with a green-screen monitor, if the EGA system can be reconfigured for MDA-compatible output. A CGA system can only be used with a colour monitor (CGA obviously, EGA if the monitor supports it), or with a television. A monochrome system (MDA or Hercules) can only be used with a monochrome monitor.

VGA is a completely different story, with different connectors and different signals (although as Ken Gober points out, converting the signals isn’t too hard — after all, they’re still h/v sync based with RGB signals). There were “monochrome” VGA monitors (“paper-white”), but they still used VGA signals.

(Nit-picking a little, early monitors weren’t 14” in diagonal; a typical size was 12”.)


They could be interchanged if you define "some effort" as "a lot of effort". The problem isn't so much the CRT tubes themselves, or the choice of 'color' or 'monochrome', but rather the circuitry that drives the electron beam deflection electromagnets, and the power supplies needed to drive those circuits. These circuits are built to sweep the electron gun across the screen at certain refresh rates, with a certain number of scan lines per frame. Trying to drive these circuits at other speeds can result in a failure of the circuit to be able to maintain sync, or it can put so much stress on the circuit that it burns out (or the power supply does).

But if you have two different CRTs that both refresh at the same rate (or close to the same rate), then converting between color and monochrome (or between digital and analog) is relatively easy to do with a fairly simple circuit.

  • I have seen at least one (third party) hardware book from the 90s or 80s that in earnest suggested re-tuning the flyback circuit (by swapping/adding capacitors and diodes IIRC) in a certain model of monochrome monitor to achieve that kind of compatibility.... Apr 7, 2017 at 10:02

It can be done, but in addition to connectors, there are three signal issues.

First, the refresh rate can be inflexible (and if it's different, there may be inadequate adjustment capability). Second, the horizontal and vertical synchronization signals may be of different types (polarity, duty cycle). Third, the video voltage levels and drive impedance are not necessarily the same.

A Macintosh Plus (monochrome) can be made to drive a VGA screen, with some tweaking (I've done that).

A start, would be to identify both monitors' deflection frequencies (Hsync and Vsync); that can be easy, a coil of wire will pick up the deflection magnetic fields, if you know how to use an oscilloscope. The TV Typewriter Cookbook and The Cheap Video Cookbook by Don Lancaster would be useful references for this. He calls the coil a 'snuffler'.

If you know some electronics, you can produce composite or separate sync signals as needed, in any polarity and duty cycle, from an available source. If valid sync signals are present, the screen will scan, and (with a variable AC/DC source) you can feed a dummy signal in and adjust for a lit rectangular area of useful size.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .