I've seen a few computers with more than two floppy drives, most with two 3.5" and one 5.25". My question is how was this achieved? I've heard that it could be done with a second controller card, but I'm not aware about FDD controller cards for PCI.

Also, what about those four-connector floppy cables (one edge connector, three standard goldpin connectors) - could've they been used to connect a 5.25" and two 3.5" drives, how about one of iOmega tape drives?

  • 2
    PCI is probably far too modern for more than two FDDs to be reasonably expected; remember PCI was introduced with the Pentium. If your aim is for IBM compatibles, you're probably better off looking toward ISA.
    – user
    Commented Jan 20, 2018 at 21:09
  • 4
    You may also be interested in some of the side commentary on my question How did MS-DOS assign drive letters in the case of more than two floppy disk drives?
    – user
    Commented Jan 20, 2018 at 21:10
  • @MichaelKjörling I had a 486 with a PCI slot, although certainly not all 486s had PCI. Commented Jan 21, 2018 at 15:12
  • ISA cards were faaaaaar more prevalent for multi-IO with a floppy controller. By which I mean at they end each had one, along with IDE, RS232 and parallel.
    – davolfman
    Commented Jun 3 at 15:59

5 Answers 5


A PC floppy controller can control two drives. For the third and fourth drive you'd need a secondary controller. I haven't ever seen one for PCI, only for ISA - some ISA cards can be configured to primary or secondary.

Edit: Raffzahn is correct: early floppy controllers did support all four drives the Shugart bus provided for. This changed with the clone market and when 3.5" disks came up (AFAIR).

The four-connector floppy cables were used in the 5.25" to 3.5" transition era - they simply provide one kind of connector each for the A: and for the B: drive, so you can connect any mix. You can only use one of the connectors in each position.

Edit2: If you don't stick to the twisted-cable scheme and jumper the address on the disk drive you can actually use all positions simultaneously (with a controller capable of driving four drives and if space allows).

Edit3: As it appears, I've looked at a non-common controller - most four-drive controller seem to use two cables with two drives each. (Thx @Raffzahn)

If this wasn't Retrocomputing I'd say get a USB floppy drive...

  • Thanks for the answer. As for the last line - I'm interested in reading old data from iomega tapes that i've mentioned earlier. Curiously, two drives that i've bought have a FDD-style connector on the back instead of IDE, and having 5.25", 3.5" and iomega ditto in one PC at the same time would be really cool.
    – redsPL
    Commented Jan 21, 2018 at 0:36
  • 1
    Early, cheap streamers used the floppy interface. Before ATAPI, the only alternative was SCSI or something proprietary. The accompanying software usually hit the hardware directly and could sometimes be picky in regards to floppy and DMA controllers.
    – Zac67
    Commented Jan 21, 2018 at 9:38
  • 1
    No, Zac67, you can't use all 4 on one cable, as the IBM cable only provides two select signals. Each connector only carries two DSx and MOTORx signals. The whole schematics are available in the adaptor manual : minuszerodegrees.net/oa/…
    – Raffzahn
    Commented Jan 21, 2018 at 18:10
  • 1
    The question is, can any BIOS or OS on a post-ISA machine handle more than two conventional floppy drives in any useful manner? Also, mind that plugging in a second ISA card without reconfiguring the I/O resources in hardware won't work... Commented Jan 22, 2018 at 9:54
  • 1
    @Raffzahn ahh, but that actual card at least has the wiring for drives 3 and 4 on the external connector, from where you could route them. Commented Jan 22, 2018 at 9:58

Following the Shugart standard, selections for 4 drives (DS0..DS3) are available on a single interface. The drives had to be jumpered accordingly. Hardware-wise the PC floppy controller also supports this. But as the original housing only allowed two (full height) drives, the controller thus split the interface onto two (proprietary) connectors: one PCB header for up to two internal drives, and a DB37 for two external drives (separate housing). Each features only two DS signals (DS0/1 internal, DS2/3 external).

To simplify installation, IBM invented the twisted floppy cable, swapping the two select lines between the PCB connectors for the drives. This took away the need for individual jumpered drives. IBM drives were always set to DS1 (*1), and addressing was done via the connector used. In fact, there's another (logical) twist, as the outermost connector is always the 'first' drive. This is due to the termination needed / built in (*2) on (early) 5.25 inch drives.

Nice design for simplifying upgrades, but it complicates more sophisticated installations - like 4 half height drives within the original case.

With an original controller it's no problem to have 4 drives. Just cable work.

Clones with integrated/on-board controller often had two pin headers for floppies, so 4 internal drives could be used (*3). Later again the second connector got often dropped, so more recent machines only supported two drives. You may want to check the manual for your machine.

Also, with 3.5 inch drives becoming standard, clone manufacturers invented the 4 connector type cables you mentioned. These are not meant to support 4 drives, but rather offer the choice to have either for each position. Usually (*4) the connectors are paired in a way making it physically impossible (*5) to add more than one drive for each position.

Edit: Here is a nice page showing the development in detail.

*1 - It's not that easy, since IBM did use drives with different labeled selector blocks. With the ones labeled DS0..DS4, DS1 is the right selection, while on drives with a DS1..DS4 labeling, DS2 needs to be selected.

*2 - Termination is another issue to take care of, at least for 5.25 inch drives. Only the last (A) drive needs one, while the second must not have it. It's a resistor array, usually looking like a socketed IC often of yellow/brownish colour, but sometimes also like a SIL package. 3.5 inch drives do not need to be changed here, as their behaviour is like automatic. It can be added as A or B without changing anything.

*3 - Be careful, some had two pin headers, but each only supporting one drive - basically moving the cable twist onto the motherboard to save on cabling costs by only needing to supply two straight cables with single connectors (and no 5.25 support).

*4 - As so often with Taiwanese creativity, there are cables made without that restriction in mind.

*5 - Well, almost - never underestimate users with a dedication to add a third drive

  • 2
    Close, but backwards. IBM drives were actually always set to DS1 (and the associated second signals), as the 2nd drive was addressed without the twist, while the twist between that and the first drive swapped the select lines to put DS0 etc where the drive would expect DS1 etc. Commented Jan 21, 2018 at 6:44
  • Do not falsely attribute claims in your answer to something I never said. You incorrectly claimed DS0, and I pointed out that it would have to be DS1 and the associated second set of signals. If another numbering scheme existed (or not) is not something I commented on, and would be irrelevant to your having gotten the ordering backwards. Commented Jan 22, 2018 at 7:16
  • @ChrisStratton Thet's the way I understood your comment. Fine with me if you don't want to be mentioned as part of the solution. I just tried to be polite.
    – Raffzahn
    Commented Jan 22, 2018 at 12:15

You'd definitely be looking for an ISA controller; it seems highly unlikely that anybody would make a PCI one as there would be little commercial application, and developing PCI cards is rare for hobbyists.

There are plenty of ISA cards available, however; this one is an open hardware design, so you can produce your own if you have the equipment to make PCBs. (It's also worth looking at the designer's list of projects if you have any other similar requirements: he's produced an entire modular PC-XT compatible system based on an ISA backplane, so some of those boards could be very handy.)

  • 1
    I've looked. I think I remember some early multi-io cards in PCI having floppy but I've yet to see any evidence online they existed.
    – davolfman
    Commented Jun 3 at 16:02

In addition to the other answers, SCSI floppy drives do exist, although they are fairly uncommon. These would be usable on even modern systems, as you can get SCSI controller cards for nearly all generations of PC clones.

  • Also USB floppy drives
    – JeremyP
    Commented Jan 22, 2018 at 9:27
  • 1
    @JeremyP I was thinking exclusively of computers with internal floppy drives, but absolutely. You can have a ridiculous number of floppy drives via USB (hundreds, if you have powered hubs), if you limit yourself to 3.5" HD drives that are external. Commented Jan 22, 2018 at 14:35
  • 1
    Interesting, never heard of these SCSI FDDs. Are there any IDE Floppy disk drives?
    – redsPL
    Commented Jan 23, 2018 at 13:43
  • 3
    @redsPL I don't believe so. SCSI floppies are pretty rare in and of themselves. They seem to be standard floppy drives with SCSI interfaces attached. I have found them on eBay, though. (Haven't pulled the trigger yet.) Commented Jan 23, 2018 at 15:35
  • 3
    There was at least one IDE device that could cope with floppies: the Imation LS120.
    – john_e
    Commented Jan 23, 2018 at 15:54

We used to sell 3-drive Apple-II systems for bookkeeping.

One drive for the Accounts, one for the Transactions and the third for the Stock/inventory.

We would simply add another floppy disk controller.

  • 3
    You see, with Apples/Amigas situation was drastically different. For example, the amiga was OK with chaining up to 3 external floppy drives, and as you said, you could add another card to the Apple-II. I was specifically asking about the IBM PC, but thanks for the fun fact anyways!
    – redsPL
    Commented Feb 5, 2018 at 19:38
  • I wonder if anyone made a "drive expander" board that would allow suitably-designed software for the Apple to use more than two drives without an extra controller? The cost of such circuitry could be a tiny fraction of the cost of another controller.
    – supercat
    Commented Jun 3 at 15:45

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .