Early computers of the 'all in one' form factors, such as the Commodore PET, the early IBM microcomputers and later models of the TRS-80, as well as the 'box' form factors such as the Altair, used a metal case; this continued through the IBM PC and all the clones thereof to the present day.

On the other hand, most early computers of the 'CPU in keyboard' form factor, such as the Apple II, Sinclair Spectrum and Commodore machines from the Vic-20 on, used plastic cases. (The one exception I can recall being the Atari 800.)

A metal case is more robust, conducts heat better and acts as an RF shield. I'm given to understand it is also slightly cheaper. (I've seen a figure of $300,000 quoted for the injection molds for a plastic case in the late seventies, and that was a time when interest rates were much higher than they are today.)

Given all those advantages of a metal case, why did so many computers use a plastic case? I could put Apple down to Steve Jobs having strong aesthetic tastes that greatly differed from mine, but Jack Tramiel and Clive Sinclair were pragmatists; I would expect them to go with a plastic case only if it had cost or other practical advantages.

  • 1
    Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
    – wizzwizz4
    Jun 5, 2018 at 15:46

5 Answers 5


Cost, both in manufacturing and design. The basic metal cases are simply that -- basic. Even modern PC cases are pretty simplistic being a metal box, with a plastic facade.

For home computers of the time, they're essentially self contained unit with "no user serviceable parts inside". They were not designed to be opened by the consumer, instead having facilities to promote external expansion. Since they're not designed to be opened and closed, plastic is a perfect material.

Obviously, the Apple II was an exception to this, having a case designed to be opened. But it was in stark contrast to most everything else until the IBM PC showed up.

With plastic, they were able to get not just lower per unit manufacturing costs, but more interesting and consumer appealing case designs. With rounded shapes, acute angles, etc. Most certainly not a "box".

These more aesthetic designs are much easier to create in plastic compared to metal.

While injection molds are indeed expensive to make, the individual unit costs are vastly lower both from a material cost and a labor cost.

10 billions McDonalds Happy Meal toys can't be wrong. The C64, Atari, and Apple computers sold in the millions of units. Easily enough to absorb the start up tooling costs of crafting injection molds.

  • 3
    The Apple II, ///, and the original Macintosh are all hybrids. It's a metal chassis with a plastic skin. This approach was taken to its (illogical) extreme with the Apple ///.
    – Brian H
    Jun 4, 2018 at 15:19
  • 4
    Even earlier PCs were definitely assumed to be "user serviceable" - in fact, there was a time when you bought "kits" you had to assemble yourself. The casings included not only plastic and metal, but also wood. Whatever is easy to work with, really :) For homebrew computers, prefabricated plastic boxes were cheap and easy to get, while wood gave you great flexibility (being very easy to "machine" at home). Metal (and steel especially) is by far the hardest to work with, even just making a hole for a switch is a large effort even with decent equipment.
    – Luaan
    Jun 5, 2018 at 7:06
  • To follow up @Luaan some computers where sold without cases one guy I worked with had a very nice teak case he built - he sourced the wood from our wood shops of cuts. Jun 14, 2018 at 20:30

Injection molding has a costly tooling cost but very low per-unit costs. This makes it cheaper to build a large number of cases.

Metal cases have a lower tooling cost but higher per-unit cost. This makes it cheaper to build a small number of cases.

  • 3
    And metal cases had other disadvantages (as well as advantages). For example, one disadvantage was they were heavy. This is an era where individual parts (e.g. peripherals) were large (disks - 5" full height, diskette drives - 5 1/4", power supplies, etc.) and thus heavier than you'd think today. The metal case made it all even heavier. I had a Zenith IBM PC AT clone - the damn thing was built like a tank and the back of my car sagged when I put it in the trunk to take it home from work.
    – davidbak
    Jun 5, 2018 at 3:17
  • 4
    @davidbak Speaking as somebody who has physically moved metal cased PETs and plastic cased PETs around buildings, I can tell you that the weight difference between the two was enormous. If you were a company shipping them in bulk, the weight saving was probably a significant cost advantage.
    – JeremyP
    Jun 6, 2018 at 9:37

I was designing computer housings back in "the day".

Plastic cases were comparatively cheap in volume, but challenging to bring to market. The technology of choice was structural foam. It was strong but thick, up to about 1/4 inch (6 mm) thick. In the basic form, it required painting, but there was a co-extrusion process that would inject at the same time both the foam a skim-coat of ABS.

The thickness caused cooling problems and dimples at intersections, so the molds were complex to cool.

Even so, the molds for structural foam were relatively cheap because the injection pressures were much lower that injecting straight ABS. With lower pressures the mold could be made of aluminum rather than steel, although with lower tool life.

But, making the molds took a long time. CNC was not as advanced, nor was CAD. I was quoted over 26 weeks for a cheap and fast structural foam mold set. Instead, we went with hand laid-up fiberglass.

A molded plastic cabinet improved the appearance of the product, but it also spoke about the company. It showed that the company had been around long enough to make molds, and was capitalized well enough to pay the cost. The company was a grown up in a world where computer companies came and went weekly.


Another reason: Simple home computers used relatively slow (both in risetime and in clock frequency) circuitry which was also contained in a relatively small area (making the wiring a less effective antenna), so the chance of becoming an EMI nuisance due to a a partially-shielded/unshielded plastic case was smaller.

Also, some home computer systems were marketed as toys and/or educational appliances. There is a possibility that in some markets, customers will have (rationally or subconsciously) associated metal cased equipment with electric shock hazards. This isn't entirely unfounded: There were more TN-C type house wiring systems in the past than these days, and these have a worst-case failure mode of setting any metal cased equipment - even if it is perfectly intact - connected to a group of outlets LIVE.

  • 5
    Early personal computers were notoriously noisy. The TRS-80 Model 3 is a direct result of FCC regulations regarding EMI. The Model 1's ribbon cable expansion connector was an absolute disaster, working well as antenna for both broadcast and reception. It was not difficult to crash a Model 1 with a conflicting EM source nearby. My KIM-1 would white out the TV from across the room. Can't say I know of a machine that was slower than a KIM-1 1MHz 6502. Was the COSMAC ELF 1MHz? Jun 6, 2018 at 23:49
  • 2
    An interesting example of this is the UK's BBC Micro. It came in a plastic (injection moulded) case, but when they made models for export to the USA they had to add metal shielding inside the case to get FCC certification.
    – Kaz
    Feb 19, 2019 at 22:00
  • 2
    @Will Hartung The Microtan 65 clocked its 6502 at 0.75MHz. The reason was that they were dividing a 6MHz video clock to get the CPU clock, and the fastest available 6502s at the time were only rated to 1MHz. 6MHz/8 gave 0.75MHz.
    – Kaz
    Feb 19, 2019 at 22:06
  • 2
    When this started there were no specific regulations on unintentional radiators like computers. It caused people like me great angst to retrofit packages and designs to comply.
    – cmm
    Mar 7, 2019 at 16:21
  • 1
    2 layer circuit boards and their cables made old computer more of an RFI nuisance and antenna for TTL rise/fall times. However they were designed before the FCC EMI rules and the threat of enforcement.
    – hotpaw2
    Jul 16, 2019 at 1:16

The original Apple II case was designed before the FCC started enforcing Part-15 consumer product RFI emission rules.

Atari used a metal shell inside a plastic case for the 400/800 because they thought the FCC rules would be enforced more strongly. Apple instead switched to plastic with a conductive coating inside and lots of gaskets instead so the Apple II+/IIe could squeak by the US FCC RFI standards (just barely).

And, yes, Steve Jobs wanted a case with a certain specific type of chamfered corners, which was much more costly and difficult to do in metal (although Apple did get a metal transmission case vendor to make them for the Apple III).

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .