It was in the movies "Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan" (1982) and "Serenity" (2005). It resembles the Honeywell 6000 series but I can't find a photo of it that matches exactly. Could it be a custom design or a prototype that never went into production?

Star Trek II Serenity (1) Serenity (2)

  • 2
    If nobody has the answer here, you may want to ask on scifi.stackexchange.com Commented Aug 13, 2018 at 3:58
  • 3
    Actually, there are already a handful of "identify-this-computer" questions on movies.stackexchange.com
    – Chenmunka
    Commented Aug 13, 2018 at 8:49
  • 2
    The layout and labelling style looks reminiscent of IBM mainframes, but with a 16-bit word size and 8-11 bit variable length opcode, it clearly isn't one.
    – Jules
    Commented Aug 13, 2018 at 9:05
  • 6
    Interestingly, in this day and age where even most well-known computers back to the 60s have had their manuals scanned and placed online, searching for some of the labels visible in the stitched-together shot turns up no relevant results ("global action codes" and "tracker display select"). I'm wondering if this is a mockup that was made for the purpose (although if so, it's good... somebody knew their computer architecture).
    – Jules
    Commented Aug 13, 2018 at 14:25
  • 2
    @MauryMarkowitz They are probably using tungsten film (as opposed to daylight film), and if the lamps in the front panel are also tungsten-based (e.g. incandescent), they will appear white at full brightness or yellow/orange-ish at less than full brightness. LED bulbs being closer to a daylight color temperature would have a bluish cast on tungsten film. Hm, have front panels ever had a brightness control? Commented Aug 13, 2018 at 22:40

2 Answers 2


StarringTheComputer.com claims it is a GE 635. I could not find pictures of that particular system, but it is consistent with descriptions in the 635's System Manual and Programming Reference Manual.

Here is a better picture from Serenity:


The GE 600 series were the first multiprocessor systems, and were touted for their multitasking and real-time abilities. It was the system upon which the Multics operating system was developed (the precursor to Unix). It also was used by the USAF to track missiles and by NASA to track the Apollo spacecraft:

GE 635 ad

GE sold their computer division to Honeywell in 1970, who renamed the architecture the Honeywell 6000 series. Here is a picture of the Processor Control Panel of a Honeywell computer:


Comparing Khan, Serenity, and the Honeywell:

  • Other than the state of the switches and indicators, the left rack of Khan is identical to Serenity's single rack.

  • The Honeywell rack has slightly different, more modern styles of switches and indicators. This would be expected from a newer computer. The fonts and colors are different. However, the layout and labeling of components is largely the same.

  • All three sources use the same indicator colors (off, white, yellow, and orange/red). There is one blue or green indicator in the right Khan rack, but this could be attributed to replacement of a burned-out indicator by the prop/set department.

  • The Honeywell displays one 36-bit register as a row of 36 indicators. It also displays two 72-bit registers each as two rows of 36 indicators. You can see such a 72-bit display in Serenity, and partially cut off in Khan. (I believe this is the M register, which buffers operands in and out of memory.)

  • Below the 72-bit display in Serenity and Khan is a table labeled "ILLEGAL ACTION CODES". The table is blurry and seems to have 14 entries. The 635 has 16 different fault modes, 2 which are manual and 14 which are machine-generated. Below this is a set of indicators that includes 5 bits of "COMMAND" and 4 bits of "ILLEGAL ACTION", which are consistent with the 635's fault handling.

  • Below that is a section of switches labeled "FAULT / STOP ON CONDITION". I can read labels for "ADDRESS" and "COMMAND" which are consistent with the 635's manual traps.

  • Below this, a hand in Khan turns a rotary switch labeled "ADDRESS STOP". A similar rotary switch appears on the Honeywell (last of the first row of dials; also see enlarged on the right of the photo).

  • Below that in Khan is a rotary switch labeled "TRACKER DISPLAY SELECT" with five positions. The same switch appears on the Honeywell. I don't find any reference to "tracker" in the 635 documentation, so this may be an add-on for missile tracking systems.

  • The right rack in Khan shows 3 bits of "TAG" and 9 more bits of "OPERATION CODE". Instructions of the 635 indeed have 3 bits of tag and 9 bits of opcode, which the documentation always spells out as "operation code".

  • The "FAULTS" next to that match the 635's hardware faults.

  • The labels within "REGISTER DISPLAY" is not legible, but the number of indicators matches what the 635 calls the "Indicator Register", which we would now call a condition code register.

  • You can't really tell the difference between the 635 and its sister models by the front panel:

The difference between these models was fewer than 10 wires on the backplane. Field service could convert a 615 to a 635 or 625 or vice versa in a couple of hours if necessary; other than those few wires, the 615, 625 and 635 were identical.


If this is a custom design, then they spent way too much time making it match the GE 600 / Honeywell 6000 family. My guess is that it was an obsolete but real system that someone was more than happy to sell off. They weren't cheap:

The 635 is now the largest computer in the GE line with a price tag of $2 million and up (lease prices start at $45,000 per month).

Computers and Automation, August 1964, p. 26


I came across this thread while doing the same type of image search (to ID the panel in Wrath of Khan). The Serenity panel is not the same one as the Wrath of Khan "deflector grid" panel the Star Trek screen grabs are from.

The Serenity one appears to be made out of several different panels. One of which was from the H6180 CPU Maintenance panel (third full-size panel down in this image) which matches the black vertical "data scroll" wheel on the left of the panel and the upper and lower light rows separated by the middle "window" between the to bit-register light rows.

I can't seem to run down the panel below it in the Serenity shot (the one with he black knob on the left).

I have had no luck not he Star Trek panel. It is maddeningly close to the Honeywell 6000 series front panels, but none of them match perfectly. I was thinking it might be the GE version before being rebadged by Honeywell, but can't seem to run down any good front panel images to compare.

It is frustrating because I am 99% sure that this has to be a found item and not a built prop.

  • In your image, I see two horizontal seams, so it looks like there are a total of 3 independently removable panels. I think most of the horizontal black lines are just pinstripes, or am I looking at it wrong? Commented Oct 29, 2018 at 22:05
  • Makes sense that Serenity was running a 6180. Mal couldn't afford much, but what money he had went towards keeping away from the Alliance. What better to help him with that than an old Multics machine - one of the few machines/operating systems rated by US military to run multiple levels of compartmentalized security on the same box at the same time? Probably got it dirt cheap because it was a bear to install and maintain ... but he had Kaylee ...
    – davidbak
    Commented Sep 2, 2019 at 1:50

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .