The 1970s saw a big transition from CPUs built from thousands of discrete components, to CPUs implemented on a single chip, with the occasional use of bit-slice components along the way.

There were, however, some CPUs implemented in a couple of chips. Setting aside coprocessors for floating-point and memory management, one division that was used was a chip for control logic and a second chip for registers and ALU, for example some implementations of the PDP-11: http://simh.trailing-edge.com/semi/f11.html

On the one hand that sounds like a logical division. On the other hand, I'm curious about how it worked in specific.

Late-70s microprocessors tended to be limited by pin count; it was tricky and expensive to go beyond 40 pins, which would quickly be eaten up by address bus, data bus and miscellaneous.

So: the control chip reads an instruction word, which decodes as an instruction to add the contents of a pair of registers. It needs to communicate this to the data chip. How does it do so? The control chip doesn't seem like it would have a bunch of spare pins for that communication, and for that matter nor does the data chip. How do they get around this?

  • There are quite a few non-bitslice multi-chip CPUs besides the F11 (e.g. the Fairchild F8, or the F-14 CADC), and all are restrained by low pin count, and somehow have to distribute everything on multiple chips, and all end up using ways to do so. Are you interested in the F11 specifically? Because I don't think this question has a general answer for all these types of CPUs. – dirkt Apr 6 at 8:57
  • To what is the "trickery and expense" with higher pin count associated? Connections to the silicon, pins on the final package, connecting the package to the motherboard? I'd have assumed the first, but on the other hand one answer below cites 80-pin chips. – another-dave Apr 6 at 14:12
  • @dirkt I picked the F11 simply as a representative example. Would be interested in other examples. As far as I can decipher the Wikipedia description, the F8 CPU is on a single chip? – rwallace Apr 6 at 16:07
  • @another-dave All of the above. Length of wires from silicon to end pins, mechanics of connecting to the board, standard testing equipment not being designed to go above 40 pins etc. Nothing impossible, to be sure; just tricky and expensive, as I said. – rwallace Apr 6 at 16:10
  • Then maybe make a more general question about multi-chip CPUs (or edit this one)? The F8 CPU needed three chips; the program counter register(s) (PC) and the data counter register (DC) were in the "ROM" chip. In a similar way, the F-11/J-11 control chip contains the ROM/PLA for microcode with associated control logic. – dirkt Apr 6 at 18:50

Answer for the PDP-11 control and data chips:

In the LSI-WCS user's guide, page 3-4 (page 67 in the PDF) and following describe the division of work between the control chip and the data chip of the PDP-11/03.

The chips themselves are connected by the microinstruction bus (MIB), the data chip is connected to the address and data part of the system bus, while the control chip deals with the control signals of the data bus.

The control chip is responsible for the microlocation address generation and the microinstruction address, it includes a location counter, an incrementer, a return register, and implements conditional and unconditional jumps. It also contains a machine instruction translation register and a translation array.

The data chip has a microinstruction register for the current microinstruction, contains the ALU, the register file both for the "macro" CPU and additional "micro" registers, and the condition code and status flags.

There's lots of details how the microcode actually works, and how the communication between the two chip works in detail, what phases there, etc. and this is all spelled out in the rest of the user's guide.

Again, note that this is specific to the PDP-11. Other multi-chip CPU implementations distributed the work between chips in very different ways.


The DEC J-11 chipset was a similar design to the F-11, and some pictures are here.

The individual chips were mounted on a chip carrier package, and had more pins (and closer pin spacing) than the package as a whole.

From the pictures, the complete J-11 "CPU" had 60 pins, but the individual chips had about 80 pins each, which seems adequate for the extra interconnections - at least 20, and possibly more if each individual chip doesn't need to access all of the 60 external pins.

The F-11 chips used similar physical packaging. Some of the DEC CPUs had 6 chips mounted on a single carrier.

  • 1
    Actually 84 pins per individual chip. There is also documentation on bitsavers for both DC334 and DC335, but I couldn't easily pick internal and external signals. chronworks.com/J11 has a diagram with names for the external pins. It was more common to use multiple control chips for additional microcode, and there were also FP accelerator chips. – dirkt Apr 6 at 18:44
  • @dirkt I didn't have enough fingers and toes to count to 21 along each side of the chips :) – alephzero Apr 6 at 19:03

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.