I remember one of the features I admired on the Macintosh in the late 80s was support for multiple displays. First time I saw this was on an SE/30, using the internal display along with a big external CRT. It had all the expected behavior of one giant desktop, allowing the user to drag the mouse and windows between the displays. Pretty cool for 1988, or so I thought. This may have used some 3rd party product (Radius?), but I am pretty sure the Macintosh II had the functionality out-of-the-box at this time, just by dropping in additional NuBus display card.

I can't recall when Windows started to support multiple displays like this. Which version of Windows first offered this functionality and with what sorts of display cards? Were there any popular 3rd party solutions for Windows before this, that allowed the Desktop to span multiple displays?

NOTE: Specifically asking about the Desktop/OS recognizing both displays - not just "mirroring" a display to an external monitor or projector as any laptop with external video port could do.

  • 10
    MS-DOS supported multiple monitors if one was attached to a Hercules graphics card. But I never tried this setup with Windows. Commented Apr 17, 2019 at 3:13
  • 2
    I agree that Windows 98 was the first version to provide official support. However I think read at the time about video cards that supported 2 monitors using custom drivers on Windows 95. Not posting as an answer because I don’t have specifics. Commented Apr 17, 2019 at 4:33
  • 1
    I ran a Hercules/VGA combo for a while. It worked with DOS because they used different parts of the memory map. You had to pick one or the other when you went into Windows though. Commented Apr 17, 2019 at 4:44
  • 2
    I can verify that the Macintosh II had multiple-monitor support out of the gate in Spring 1987. I was involved with its beta-test cycle. There had long been rumors of a color-display Mac, but the multi-monitor support was a (welcome) surprise. We were given only a single display and card (4-bit-per-pixel monochrome!), but when more machines started arriving, we put another video card into the beta-box and it worked seamlessly.
    – jeffB
    Commented Apr 17, 2019 at 13:27
  • 2
    The question is about dual monitor 'Support', in Windows and I am unclear about that so won't attempt to answer that. However as a developer who was doing C/C++ development in an office running DOS, Windows 3.x and OS2 in 1991-1993, we all had expensive 17” monitors and a second mono screen connected to a Hercules card. The Borland debugger wrote output to the Herc screen while we ran the Windows app on the primary screen. So Windows 3.11 allowed multiple monitors; just not well supported by the OS.
    – GrantB
    Commented May 8, 2020 at 21:33

1 Answer 1


The first release of Windows to provide built-in support for multiple monitors, on graphics cards with appropriate drivers, was Windows 98. Support was subsequently added to the NT line with Windows 2000.

Some graphics cards provided support for multiple monitors in earlier versions of Windows, at least in Windows NT 4.0 as described here (with SP3, released in May 1997); Matrox cards in particular were famous for this. I used a G450 with dual outputs under NT 4.0 with two monitors.

I suspect that some CAD software (AutoCAD in particular) might have supported multiple monitors on Windows earlier than that — this was a common setup on other platforms (including DOS).

  • 5
    I also appreciate this post from Raymond Chen, a long-time Windows developer. They made sure that Windows 98 could handle up to 9 monitors, with the limit inspired by the opening sequence of the "Brady Bunch" show.
    – user616
    Commented Apr 17, 2019 at 13:41
  • 3
    I remember from back then that conventional wisdom was to not install a Windows NT OS before SP3 was out, because by SP3 most of the teething problems of the new version were fixed.
    – user
    Commented Apr 17, 2019 at 14:24

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .