Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with 6502
Search options not deleted
user 4353
For 6502 series of processors, including hardware and assembly language questions. Use with [hardware] for the hardware interface in particular.
12
votes
3
answers
1k
views
How does 6502 machine code process $ (address) VS #$ (value)?
How does the 6502's machine code process $ vs #$, as in it's assembly language? … (finding info on 6502 assembly is easy, on machine code processing in general not so much, so I don't know if there's a standard way or if this is a stupid question or not!) …
- 637
15
votes
2
answers
2k
views
How could high level functions with return values map to 6502 assembly? (if at all possible)
byte func(byte a, byte b, byte c) {
d = (a + b) * c;
return d;
}
How could that be done on 6502, or is it impossible? … If 6502 programmers would need to do something like the above, using a subroutine, how would they do it? …
- 637