Timeline for What did the 8086 (and 8088) do upon encountering an illegal instruction?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
18 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 18, 2019 at 17:46 | comment | added | wizzwizz4♦ | @StephenKitt Which point of view is your answer taking? I can write one about a different one. | |
Jun 18, 2019 at 17:40 | comment | added | wizzwizz4♦ | @StephenKitt Do you have time now, or should I write it? | |
Jun 15, 2019 at 9:30 | comment | added | Raffzahn | @StephenKitt After a bit rereading, I no longer see it as a duplicate, as the liked question is specific about undocumented opcodes and their usage in relation to documentes, while this is strictly about the 8086 and its handling. | |
Jun 15, 2019 at 9:29 | history | edited | Raffzahn | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 245 characters in body; edited tags
|
Jun 15, 2019 at 8:58 | comment | added | Raffzahn | I just got it this for close review, and I have a hard time to decide. For one, it does tackle the issue for a specific CPU, while the other is more generic. But Stephen is as well right, both may trigger the same answers. But not due the way this one if phrased, but rather because the other is way to broad. Marking it as double would be good to target future readers toward the already given answers - better than copying. But then again, asking exactly for the 8086 is a question in its own right. No idea for a middle way, I vote leave open - maybe to incooperate the link into the question. | |
Jun 15, 2019 at 3:01 | review | Close votes | |||
Jun 15, 2019 at 8:58 | |||||
Jun 14, 2019 at 0:37 | comment | added | Tim Holt | I keep wanting this question to be the lead line for a joke... | |
Jun 13, 2019 at 17:39 | vote | accept | Joe D | ||
Jun 13, 2019 at 14:44 | answer | added | telcoM | timeline score: 8 | |
Jun 12, 2019 at 15:03 | answer | added | pedro | timeline score: 1 | |
Jun 11, 2019 at 17:45 | comment | added | wizzwizz4♦ | @StephenKitt Could you write up a Retrocomputing Meta question? You have a very good point, and I have a slightly-less-good rebuttal, but we really need to decide on this as a community. | |
Jun 11, 2019 at 17:31 | comment | added | wizzwizz4♦ | @StephenKitt I'd err on the side of not closing it if the questions themselves aren't identical; it's possible that there are answers to this one that wouldn't be answers to the others, and I know for sure that the other way around also applies. | |
Jun 11, 2019 at 1:07 | history | became hot network question | |||
Jun 10, 2019 at 21:40 | review | Close votes | |||
Jun 11, 2019 at 4:48 | |||||
Jun 10, 2019 at 17:49 | answer | added | Ken Gober | timeline score: 46 | |
Jun 10, 2019 at 17:44 | answer | added | wizzwizz4♦ | timeline score: 58 | |
Jun 10, 2019 at 17:10 | review | First posts | |||
Jun 10, 2019 at 17:25 | |||||
Jun 10, 2019 at 17:02 | history | asked | Joe D | CC BY-SA 4.0 |