Timeline for Are there multiple models of the Intel 8089 IOP?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20 at 12:54 | answer | added | Simon Kissane | timeline score: 3 | |
| Feb 8, 2023 at 18:30 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Feb 8, 2023 at 21:49 | |||||
| Feb 8, 2023 at 13:19 | history | edited | Toby Speight | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Spelling and grammar
|
| Feb 5, 2023 at 12:42 | answer | added | Raffzahn | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jan 29, 2023 at 18:24 | comment | added | juffma | Youre right, it seems to be like that. That numebr still confuses me tho. propably thats just something about energy usage. | |
| Jan 29, 2023 at 17:58 | comment | added | tofro | Wikipedia seems to think along the same lines: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_8089 | |
| Jan 29, 2023 at 17:32 | comment | added | juffma | i thought that too, but the "revision number" 3 irritated me so i had no clue if it actually was this | |
| Jan 29, 2023 at 17:16 | comment | added | tofro | It's very likely this chip never made it over its initial 5MHz version - Simply because IBM decided not to include it in their PC architecture (and used the 8237 instead). | |
| Jan 29, 2023 at 16:12 | history | edited | juffma | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| S Jan 29, 2023 at 16:12 | review | First questions | |||
| Jan 29, 2023 at 17:41 | |||||
| S Jan 29, 2023 at 16:12 | history | asked | juffma | CC BY-SA 4.0 |