Skip to main content

Timeline for How did the BBC Micro stay cool?

Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0

8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 29, 2018 at 21:59 comment added Jules Adding a fan would have been completely unnecessary, however.
Jul 29, 2018 at 21:58 comment added Jules @fadden - I ran a 100MHz Pentium 24hrs a day for approximately 5 years without any form of heat sink, and it never suffered from it. Having adequate airflow in the case is enough; a fan was only necessary if that wasn't possible. The Pentium 100MHz had a typical dissipation of about 4W; without a heat sink and with moderate airflow its thermal resistance is about 12C/W, which means that as long as the case temperature remains under about 35C it'll stay at a reasonable temperature that's unlikely to cause harm. I should have used a heat sink for it, but practically it was fine without.
Jul 29, 2018 at 17:50 comment added fadden Looking at my PC construction history (fadden.com/tech/my-pcs.html), my 90MHz Pentium 90 from 1995 had a CPU heat sink + fan. The 266MHz Pentium-II that went into a machine in 1997 came on a card with the heat sink and fan built in. I don't know that it was necessary, but IIRC it was pretty typical for 90MHz Pentium and later to have a fan.
S Jul 29, 2018 at 17:20 history suggested Peter Mortensen CC BY-SA 4.0
Copy edited (e.g. ref. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hertz#SI_multiples>).
Jul 29, 2018 at 16:25 review Suggested edits
S Jul 29, 2018 at 17:20
Jul 29, 2018 at 14:24 comment added Martin Bonner supports Monica The first Pentium 90 my office got would have been a lot more stable with a cooling fan. It crashed every day or so - which was a nuisance for a machine that was supposed to run a modelling programming which took a week (which is why we wanted the faster Pentium).
Jul 28, 2018 at 13:25 review First posts
Jul 28, 2018 at 16:21
Jul 28, 2018 at 13:23 history answered WhatEvil CC BY-SA 4.0