# What was the typical thickness of fanfold printer paper?

Fanfold paper was commonly used for computer printouts from the 1950s to the 1980s. What was the typical thickness of such paper?

• The answer must be a measure of thickness, not weight. I am well aware that paper is typically sold by weight. Nonetheless, that is not at all what the question is asking.
• Paper is sold in various thicknesses. I'm looking for the kind that was typically used for program listings, the cheap "green-bar" stuff, like in the picture above.
• Specialty paper such as carbon- or carbonless-forms or checks should be excluded.
• The pages must be continuous (un-separated) when measured. So, simply stating the thickness of non-fanfold paper is not acceptable.
• There are many ways to express the answer, such as the thickness of one page, the thickness of 1000 pages, how many pages in one inch, and so on. Use whatever method you want, as long as the answer clearly specifies how the measurement is being made. Either inches, cm, or mm are acceptable units.

A printout of the Apollo spacecraft source code:

• Estimating the lady at about 155cm (she looks small...), we're talking about 20000 (rather less) sheets of paper. Commented Nov 4, 2018 at 18:47
• The paper in the top photo is not greenbar; instead it has thin gray lines every 3 print lines, another common printer paper. Greenbar has solid light green bars which cover 3 print lines alternating with white area for 3 print lines. Commented Nov 4, 2018 at 19:31
• Feel free to edit in a better picture of greenbar. However, please keep the picture of the Apollo source code. Commented Nov 4, 2018 at 20:38
• @tofro People vary widely and so that be be hard to guess well, but we have a double wall socket that should be some standard size, or perhaps the floor tiling, and - of course! - the paper width should be some standard size. Commented Nov 4, 2018 at 22:20
• What is this? Some kind of test? Why are you laying all these conditions on people? Commented Nov 5, 2018 at 11:10

The paper I used in my dot-matrix printers (and still buy and use today) has 60g/m2 for the cheaper green-lined type and 70g/m2 for the pure white version.

There is a rough guideline in the paper industry to calculate paper thickness from weight per square meter: t = 1.3 * wsqm / 1000

60g/m2 roughly ends up at 0.08mm, 70g/m2 around 0.09mm

EDIT: Just verified the pure white (I had a page at hand) with a micrometer: it is indeed just a tad under 0.09mm per page.

There is an old carboard box that used to contain fanfold paper right next to me.

Using the label on the box for the number of sheets and a ruler to measure the box, a stack of 2200 sheets was 7 1/2 inches thick, which is near enough 300 sheets per inch. or 0.085mm per sheet if you prefer those units.

This would have been plain white paper, the stuff we used by the ton for program listings, core dumps, etc - and probably the thinnest grade that would work reliably with high speed line printers.

In the US, paper is normally measured in pounds (lbs.) with the actual measurement defined a little differently depending on the type of paper - "cover", "text", etc. That is a very long discussion, and not that relevant here, here is one sample chart comparing types of paper/weights.

The end result is the usual way to refer to office paper, including, in my experience, fan-fold computer printer paper, is in lbs. for "bond" paper, with 20 lbs. being "typical ordinary copier paper", 15 lbs. being "lightweight" and 24 lbs. being "a little heavier, often for stationery". I remember typically 15 or 20 lbs. for fan-fold paper. You wouldn't normally go heavier than 20 lbs., but sometimes you would go lighter to save money and space.

Staples still sells green-bar paper and it is 15 lbs.

As far as overall thickness, a ream (500 pages) of paper is about 2" thick, or ~ 250 pages /inch. 15lb. paper should be ~ 3/4 as thick, or around 330 pages/inch.

• 250 pages/in. is 0.10 mm/page. 330 is 0.08. Commented Nov 4, 2018 at 23:30

The typical stuff we used to use for program listings, etc., came 3000 sheets, fanfolded, to a box that was 12 inches high. That would make one sheet 0.004 inches or about 0.1 mm thick.

This jibes well with Dave's answer, which refers to paper that's already been out of the box, through the printer, refolded, and squeezed. If it had not been squeezed it would have "measured" a bit thicker. So I think this is a pretty good answer.

n.b.: Personally I preferred blue-space-bar to green-space-bar. It disappeared when copied better than the green did, at least on the copiers we had at the time.

• Depending on what you do, sometimes keeping the visible green bars is actually a good thing as it helps when trying to read long lines, especially with spreadsheet-like data. Commented Nov 5, 2018 at 0:56
• And sometimes it isn't. :D With the "blue bar" paper I could adjust the copier's contrast control to either drop out the blue bars, or not. With the green bar paper the bars were very difficult to get rid of. Commented Nov 6, 2018 at 3:25

Approximately 0.1mm, based on the first fanfold printout I could lay my hands on in my office (vintage early 1970s). This has 10 sheets and squeezes down to 1mm, as near as I could eyeball it with a desk ruler. As far as I can recall, this was a fairly sturdy paper as such papers went. The printout was from an ICL 1903A computer, I never knew the printer's designation.

I have half of a box of Moore Paragon Paraflow 12-inch pin-feed fanfold for ASR 43 Teletypes. 400 sheets measures 37mm. It will compress only a little, to 36mm,but only when pressed hard at the point of measurement. So THIS paper is 0.0036 inches thick, but no thinner than 0.0035 inches. And it feels about the same as the wider line printer paper (enough of which I do not have, for accurate thickness measurement). Kevin T, Sydney, Australia.

• A blast from the past! I used to have a TTY 43. I got it (with my evil twin) around 1980. Must have gotten rid of it in the early 1990s. One of the only machines I know of that used 12" (11" with the holes removed) wide paper, which was actually quite convenient - 132 column printouts on 8-1/2 x 11. Those were the days. Commented Nov 5, 2018 at 15:42

This question makes a lot of unnecessary and more harming non related assumptions. Most notably the exclusion of its grammage as base value, as that is the way paper handling is done.

For all practical purpose Tofro's answer already covers a good estimation as a bit less than 0.1 mm.

Paper thickness is related in a linear fashion to its weight. All it needs to go from the ubiquitous notation of grammage (weight per surface size) to thickness is to include its specific weight (weight per volume). Dividing these will easily deliver thickness. 4th grade math assumed.

With grammage in g/m^3 and specific weight in g/cm^3 this gets transformed into a simple

grammage * specific weight / 1000

The specific weight of a certain paper is defined by its style and how 'smooth' (*1) it is. For most practical purpose it ranges from 0.6 to 1.3 ) g/cm^3. As a result 80g/m^2 paper may range at 0.048 to 0.104 mm

Now, having done the basic math, there is also a less theoretical way. People like to have simple numbers, so paper maker also came up with a simple definition system for thickness of standard papers, defining a standard 'Volume' specifier which gets given out by paper makers to further define their paper.

It got set (*2) to 1 for a paper of a specific weight of 1 g/cm^3. Sounds superfluous, but using the term Volume as unit less classification instead of a specific weight with a complex unit seems to improve usage by non-nerds (*3).

For practical purposes, a volume 1 paper has a thickness in mm at exactly its grammage divided by 1000. So a volume 1 paper with 80 g/m^2 will have a thickness of 0.08 mm. Similarly, a 100 g/m^2 paper will have a thickness of 0.1 mm. Paper of different thickness is noted with a different 'Volume' like 1.5 for a thicker one, which with the same 80 g/m^2 will measure 0.12 mm. (80*1.5/1000)

This is especially great, as average office paper is of 'Volume' 1 type.

Bottom line: Just take the grammage, divide it by 1000 and apply the 'Volume' specifier. If none is given then 1 is a good value to start with for fine office paper, while cheaper and/or simple recycles one goes up to 1.2-1.4 (*4).

(Classic) Printer use, they are made to work well with paper of 0.2 mm or more (0.17 being a punch card type paper) and more importantly, several layers of such. Usually the transport mechanics (straight vs. bend over some rollers) and the stiffness was more important than thickness itself. Mainframe chain printers could work well with forms with fanfold 'paper' of 8 (!) layers paper and 7 intermediate carbon layers (*4) - although, one had to be rather exact when positioning the paper box and quite careful mounting the paper.

*1 - The German term paper makers use here is 'Gestrichen'. I have heard the term 'coated' in similar situations in English. Thicker papers are often called double or triple gestrichen/coated. Keep in mind, I'm definitely no expert about paper making, especially not in multiple languages.

*2 - Yes, as with everything there's a DIN fixing it, just don't ask me about the number.

*3 - It's also a real great example why the metric system is so easy. If everything is noted down using the same unit system, conversion usually breaks down to simple shifts - in this case shift right by 3.

*4 - Yes, that felt more like a diaper than printing paper:)

I measured the program listing from my master's degree project, printed on a line printer at London University in 1975. It is 44 sheets. The total thickness is 4.19 mm, giving 0.095 mm per sheet. I made no special requests, so the paper was typical line printer paper of its time.

It has been stored, usually flat, for over 40 years. I don't know whether that will have affected the thickness.

The fanfold paper I used varied from about 100 g/m², in stuff sold for home computer use, and thus for writing letters, to really thin, maybe 40 g/m², at penny-pinching employers.

The g/m² unit means "grams per square meter", which is the standard measure for paper weight in the UK and the EU. Ordinary photocopier paper is usually 80 g/m², nice letterhead paper is up to 200gsm.

• Can you convert that to a linear thickness (e.g. mm)? Commented Nov 4, 2018 at 17:59
• @DrSheldon: Afraid not. The density of paper varies considerably, and I have no way to find it out for paper I used decades ago. It's sold by weight, because that's the more useful measure to the manufacturers. Commented Nov 4, 2018 at 18:08
• This doesn't answer the question, which explicitly asks about the thickness of the paper, not its grammage. Commented Nov 5, 2018 at 18:46
• Thickness is related to paper quality - but roughly linear to weight. Commented Nov 5, 2018 at 19:23
• @Raffzahn — thickness has very little to do with paper quality. Thick, pulpy paper can be very weak. The very strongest paper used in publishing is the ultra-thin but just opaque “bible paper”. It's made from very long staple cotton fibre. If a book is well bound, you should be able to pick it up just by lifting it by a single page. It won't tear if it's good paper. Commented Nov 6, 2018 at 2:48