Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with assembly
Search options questions only
not deleted
user 6487
Assembly languages in general, of any architecture. Use with the particular processor’s tag as appropriate.
69
votes
13
answers
17k
views
Were later MS-DOS versions still implemented in x86 assembly?
What is odd in my opinion is the use of x86 assembly language for everything. The assembly language would not be my first choice for implementing an operating system. … Was this assembly language approach used also in the newest versions of MS-DOS in the 1990s? …
- 1,165